Using the results (quality of report, communication)
The evaluation report should address the interests of both the direct audience (P2P members, policy-makers, funders) as well as the indirect audience of the evaluation (researchers, industry, society etc.).
The main issues that affect the degree to which evaluations provide usefulness and utility to policy makers primarily concern the information sought by the evaluation.
They value information on
However, this set of issues is particularly relevant to evaluations of policy interventions that have typically, been commissioned by those directly concerned with sponsoring or implementing the policy and thus have a narrow set of concerned stakeholders.
In the case of R&I Partnership, the set of stakeholders will be much broader and, at a minimum will include
Each stakeholder group will have specific interests and needs concerning the outcome of any evaluation.
Funding agencies may wish to learn about the efficiency of the policy intervention to ensure that tax payers’ money is being used optimally, whilst higher level policy makers will be interested in the networking effects and the extent to which other countries’ agencies have become involved. Researchers will be interested in particular contributions to their research field, while the European Commission will wish to assess the overall contribution of the policy intervention towards its own set of objectives. This varied set of stakeholder concerns will probably necessitate some tailoring of the evaluation outputs to the different needs of the evaluation audiences.
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to remember your settings. Please check our privacy and cookies policy.
We use cookies for statistical purposes and to remember your settings. Please check our privacy and cookies policy.